What is a possible outcome if a soldier is incapable of full rehabilitation?

Informing the commander about the situation is a crucial step when a soldier is incapable of full rehabilitation. This action ensures that the chain of command is aware of the soldier’s challenges and can make informed decisions regarding their future within the unit. The commander often plays a significant role in determining the next course of action, which may include further evaluation, the provision of support services, or potential administrative actions.

By communicating the soldier’s status to the commander, it allows for a tailored response that can address the soldier's needs while also considering the overall functioning and morale of the unit. This option reflects the importance of leadership involvement in recovery processes and the broader implications for unit readiness and cohesion.

Other options involve actions that may not align with the supportive and rehabilitative focus of the Army Substance Abuse Program. Immediate reassignment does not directly help the soldier's recovery and could be premature without understanding the full context. Conducting a public hearing is not relevant in cases of individual rehabilitation issues, as it could breach confidentiality and negatively impact the soldier's situation. Referring the soldier to military court would typically apply in cases of criminal behavior related to substance abuse rather than rehabilitation status. Thus, involving the commander represents a proactive and suitable response.